Description
The Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order is given to those who have taken on issues of world importance and presented viewpoints that could lead to a more just and peaceful world. Each idea supports one noble cause: to inspire us all to work together for the common good.
The Award is presented annually to the winner of a competition designed to stimulate the recognition, dissemination and critical analysis of outstanding proposals for improving world order.
Prize Amount
The Grawemeyer Award in World Order is accompanied by a prize of $100,000, which is presented in full during the awards ceremony.
Eligibility
Submissions will be judged according to originality, feasibility and potential impact, not by the cumulative record of the nominee. They may address a wide range of global concerns including foreign policy and its formation; the conduct of international relations or world politics; global economic issues, such as world trade and investment; resolution of regional, ethnic or racial conflicts; the proliferation of destructive technologies; global cooperation on environmental protection or other important issues; international law and organization; any combination or particular aspects of these, or any other suitable idea which could at least incrementally lead to a more just and peaceful world order.
History
Professors of political science Paul Weber and Landis Jones, who both had taught Charles Grawemeyer in his retirement years, met with him when they learned of his interest in creating an award in political science. Weber and Jones were optimistic but puzzled. They had taught Mr. Grawemeyer radically different courses but thought of him as a provocative and thoughtful student. He did everything the young students did except take the exams. He even bought all the books and, when finished, gave them to the professors to pass on to deserving students the following semester.
In their meeting, Grawemeyer got to the point, Weber recalled. He wanted to fund a prize in international political science, “something like the Nobel, only better.” Grawemeyer had studied the Nobel and saw its value for recognizing people who have done something. “Who can be like Martin Luther King or Mother Teresa?” Weber recalled Grawemeyer pondering. It was clear Grawemeyer liked ideas that might make a difference. According to Weber, Grawemeyer told them, “Peace is a good idea, but it’s too narrow. We need justice, too, and well-ordered societies all across the world. I’d like to reward ideas that get us closer to that.”
The first Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order was shared in 1988 by two Harvard professors: Richard Neustadt and Ernest May. Their work, “Thinking In Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Making,” uses 30 case studies to challenge political decision makers to use their experiences and those of hundreds of historic figures, in disciplined thought patterns, to govern, manage and exercise authority.
The Nomination Process
Criteria For Judging Nominations
The university committee overseeing the award invites nominations from throughout the world by individual political scientists expert in the area, by professional associations of political scientists or related disciplines in international relations, by university presidents or by publishers and editors of journals and books in political science and world affairs. Self- nominations will not be considered.
Nomination Process
Each nomination letter must be submitted in English and be accompanied by a nomination form. The nominator must briefly explain the significance of the nomination and why it is presumed worthy of the award. The idea or ideas considered may be found in printed books and articles in scholarly or distinguished journals, and also in public speeches or other widely and publicly disseminated documents so long as they first appeared between January 2020 and December 2024. All submissions shall include the following:
-
-
-
- Four (4) copies of the idea as published in book form, article or speech (written text or transcript) including all standard bibliographic citations and copyright citations. Nominations not in English must be accompanied by an English summary or abstract and a translation of the most essential parts.
-
-
-
-
-
- Biographical materials about the author(s) of the idea or about the group or institution if the idea is the product of such an entity.
-
-
-
-
-
- A completed nomination form is due January 31.
-
-
-
-
-
- A completed nominee release form with all other materials is due February 28.
-
-
-
-
-
- Acknowledgment that one copy of all materials submitted will become a part of the permanent university archives.
-
-
-
-
-
- Independent supporting materials such as book reviews and newspaper articles are encouraged. Usually, solicited letters of support are not very helpful.
-
-
Deadline
Entries must be submitted in four copies and accompanied by a nomination form, nominatorās letter, biographical sketch of nominee and agreement that the material will be placed in university archives. Non-English entries must be translated. All nominations for the 2024 Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order should reach the University of Louisville by January 31,Ā 2025,Ā and all supporting materials (books, articles, speeches, reviews) are due by February 28, 2025. Nominated works must have appeared between January 2020 and December 2024.
The Review Process
Following a rigorous screening process, three finalists will be recommended to the University of Louisville award committee. This committee, consisting of the president of the university, the dean of Arts and Sciences, the chair of the Department of Political Science and up to four persons named by the president, will select the winning submission for the award. Upon recommendation by the president of the university, the university Board of Trustees will grant the award.
Restrictions
Ideas or achievements must have been presented or published within the past five years. Nominations may be made by colleagues or publishers; self-nomination is not allowed. Generally, edited books are not considered. Previous winners are not eligible for nomination a second time. Current University of Louisville faculty, staff and students are not eligible. Graduates from the University of Louisville must wait at least five (5) years before they can be nominated.
Selection
Initial screening by a committee of political scientists, followed by peer review by prominent experts. Secondary screening by a jury of three prominent political scientists, statesmen, journalists, economists, lawyers or military experts. Final screening by U of L president, College of Arts and Sciences dean, political science chairman and up to four others named by the Faculty Director. University trustees approve final recommendation.
For More Information
Nominations and requests for further information should be sent to:
Dr.Ā Charles Ziegler
Faculty Director
Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order
Department of Political Science
Ford Hall, Room 205
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40292
USA
Phone:Ā 502.852.3248
Email: Ā charles.ziegler@louisville.edu
Previous Winners
2023 – Steven Feldstein
Digital technology is playing a growing role in advancing political repression across the globe, a trend that poses a threat to the worldās democracies, says a scholar who today was named winner of the 2023 University of Louisville Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order.
2022 – Mona Lena Krook
Rutgers University scholar Mona Lena Krook has won the 2022 University of Louisville Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order for exploring the nature of violence against women in politics and suggesting ways to prevent it.
2021 – Ken Conca
The United Nations can tackle global environmental challenges far more effectively by incorporating two overlooked parts of its mandateāhuman rights and peaceāinto its efforts.
2020 – No Award Given
2019 – Sakiko Fukuda-Parr, Terra Lawson-Remer and Susan Randolph
An innovative framework designed to improve the ability of countries to expand human rights, Sakiko Fukuda-Parr, Terra Lawson-Remer and Susan Randolph were named co-winners for the ideas set forth in their book, āFulfilling Social and Economic Rights.ā
2018 – Scott Straus
In the book, Straus, who teaches at University of Wisconsin-Madison, explains how ideas and political messages can become tipping points for genocide. His original research examines patterns and circumstances that have resulted in genocide and contrasts those with similar situations where genocide seemed likely to happen but did not. Straus contends that the āfounding narrativesā of national leaders can determine whether an ethnic minority is tolerated or deemed a threat to the state.
2017 – Dana Burde
Education and political science scholar and former aid worker Dana BurdeĀ examined the influence of foreign-backed funding for education on war-torn countries and how such aid affects humanitarian and peace-building efforts.
2016 – Gary Haugen and Victor Boutros
The absence of law enforcement in developing countries undermines the fight against global poverty. This theory, explored in the 2014 book The Locust Effect: Why the End of Poverty Requires the End of Violence, has earned its authors the 2016 University of Louisville Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order.
Read more…
2015 – Mark Weiner
Understanding clan-based cultures is critical to the survival of modern democracies, says a legal historian who has won the 2015 University of Louisville Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order. Rutgers University law professor Mark S. Weiner earned the prize for ideas set forth in his 2013 book, āThe Rule of the Clan: What an Ancient Form of Social Organization Reveals About the Future of Individual Freedom.ā
2014 – Jacques HymansĀ
A book explaining why nuclear weapons programs in many developing nations have been prone to inefficiency and failure has won the 2014 University of Louisville Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order.
2013 – Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan
Non-violent resistance brings about political change much more effectively than the use of violence, say two scholars who have won the 2013 University of Louisville Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order.
2012- Severine Autesserre
Analysis of what went wrong in Congo wins Grawemeyer Award. Autesserre’s idea that lasting conflict resolution must take place from the bottom up as well as from the top down āholds great promise for the pursuit of peace.ā
2011 – Kevin Bales
Kevin Bales, president of Free the Slaves, a human rights organization based in Washington, D.C., won the $100,000 annual prize for ideas set forth in his 2007 book, āEnding Slavery: How We Free Todayās Slaves.ā
2010 – Trita Parsi
Improving relations between Iran and Israel is the key to achieving lasting peace in the Middle East, says the winner of the 2010 University of Louisville Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order.
2009 – Michael Johnston
“Syndromes of Corruption: Wealth, Power and Democracy”
2008 – Philip Tetlock
“Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?”
2007 – Roland Paris
“At Warās End: Building Peace After Civil Conflict”
2006 – Fiona Terry
“Condemned to Repeat? The Paradox of Humanitarian Action”
2005 – Francis Deng and Roberta Cohen
Guidelines for a protection and aid system for internally displaced people, or people who are displaced within their home nations
2004 – John Braithwaite and Peter Drahos
āGlobal Business Regulationā
2003 – Stuart Kaufman
āModern Hatreds: The Symbolic Politics of Ethnic Warā
2001 – Janine Wedel
“Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to Eastern Europe 1989-1998”
2000 – Margaret E. Keck and Kathryn Sikkink
“Activists Beyond Borders”
1997 – Herbert Kelman
“Interactive Problem Solving”
1996 – Max Singer and Aaron Wildavsky
“The Real World Order: Zones of Peace/Zones of Turmoil”
1995 – Gareth Evans
“Cooperative Security and Intra-State Conflict”
1994 – Mikhail Gorbachev
1988 address to the United Nations
1993 – Donald Harman Akenson
“God’s Peoples: Covenant and Land in South Africa, Israel and Ulster”
1992 – Samuel Huntington, Herman Daly and John Cobb
“The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century”
1991 – The United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development
“Our Common Future”
1990 – Robert Jervis
“The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon”
1989 – Robert Keohane
“After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy”
1988 – Richard Neustadt and Ernest May
“Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers”
2024 Recipient
Neta Crawford (photo by Vernon Doucette, Boston University Photography)
Scholar who measures Pentagonās carbon footprint wins 2024 world order prize
By Denise Fitzpatrick
The U.S. military must reduce its dependence on fossil fuels so the world can effectively address climate change, says the winner of the 2024 University of Louisville Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order.
Neta Crawford, an international relations professor at the University of Oxford in England, received the prize for the ideas in her book āThe Pentagon, Climate Change and War: Charting the Rise and Fall of Military Emissionsā published by MIT Press in 2022.
The U.S. military is the worldās largest single institutional producer of greenhouse gases, Crawford found. Between 1975 and 2022, its emissions averaged 81 million metric tons of greenhouse hydrocarbons a yearāmore than most countries. After it reduced operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, its emissions dropped to an annual average of 51 million metric tons, a level that still poses more risk to human existence than most military conflicts, she found.
āThe Pentagon looks at the world in terms of threats but doesnāt see its own emissions as part of the problem,ā she said. āIf itās going to successfully switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy, it must stop defending oil-rich countries and develop a different approach to national security.ā
Crawford is the first scholar to thoroughly assess the U.S. militaryās global emissions profile and weigh its implications, said Charles Ziegler, who directs the world order award.
āShe convincingly explains how the militaryās dependence on fossil fuels and consequent need to defend the sources of those fuels leads to a cycle of demand, consumption, militarization and conflict,ā Ziegler said. āShe also explains how the Pentagon can do more to make life on our planet sustainable.ā
Crawford, Montague Burton Professor of International Relations at Oxford since 2021, also codirects the Costs of War Project, a non-partisan effort at Brown University assessing the human and financial costs of U.S. wars. She was inducted into the British Academy and American Academy of Arts and Sciences earlier this year and won an International Studies Association distinguished scholar award in 2018.
Recipients of the 2024 Grawemeyer Awards are being named this week pending formal trustee approval. The annual, $100,000 prizes also honor seminal ideas in music, psychology, education and religion. Winners will visit Louisville in the spring to accept their awards and give free talks on their winning ideas.
Video Interviews with Past Recipients
Ken Conca – Interview with Bill Miller for the Global Connections TV program
2021 World Order Recipient Ken Conca
Fulfilling Social and Economic Rights
2019 World Order Recipients Sakiko Fukuda-Parr, Terra Lawson-Remer and Susan Randolph
Understanding the tipping points that can lead to genocide in Africa
2018 World Order Recipient Scott Straus
Schools for Conflict or for Peace in Afghanistan
2017 World Order Recipient Dana Burde
The Plague of Hidden, Everyday Violence Inflicted on the Poor
2016 World Order Recipients Gary Haugen and Victor Boutros
Understanding Clan-Based Cultures
2015 World Order Recipient Mark S. Weiner
An Original Take on Nuclear Proliferation
2014 World Order Recipient Jacques Hymans
Non-Violence is More Effective than Violence in Bringing about Change
2013 World Order Recipients Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan
What Went Wrong in the Congo
2012 World Order Recipient Severine Autesserre
Ending the Problem of Modern-Day Slavery
2011 World Order Recipient Kevin Bales
The Key to Achieving Lasting Peace in the Middle East
2010 World Order Recipient Trita Parsi
Interview WithĀ Michael Johnston
2009 World OrderĀ Recipient Michael Johnston